How does software security review work?

A recent LLM assisted audit of a mature codebase reportedly surfaced many vulnerabilities and denial of service issues despite earlier professional reviews. The lasting lesson is not that AI replaces security engineers, but that software security is an ongoing system of discovery, validation, and risk reduction.

Why this matters now

Software now sits behind payments, identity, healthcare workflows, internal knowledge systems, mobile apps, and AI products. A small coding mistake can become data exposure, account takeover, service downtime, or a compliance failure. For professionals, software security is no longer a niche AppSec concern. It affects product strategy, engineering velocity, customer trust, and operational resilience.

The pressure is rising because software stacks are more interconnected. Applications depend on open source packages, cloud services, APIs, mobile distribution channels, model endpoints, vector databases, and deployment automation. Each connection expands the attack surface. At the same time, AI tools can scan more code, generate test cases, summarize risky flows, and propose fixes. That increases coverage, but it also increases the need for human judgment. A model finding is a candidate, not proof. Teams still need to confirm exploitability, business impact, and the safest fix.

How it works

Software security is the practice of reducing the likelihood and impact of attacks against software systems. It combines asset inventory, threat modeling, secure design, code review, testing, triage, remediation, and monitoring. The goal is not perfect safety. The goal is to make valuable assets harder to compromise, failures easier to detect, and recovery faster.

  Asset inventory ·····················
     │
     ▼
  Threat modeling ····················
     │
     ▼
  Code review and testing ············
     │
     ▼
  Triage ·····························
     │
     ▼
  Fix and monitor ····················

Asset inventory asks what the system contains: code, data, secrets, users, dependencies, infrastructure, and external integrations. Threat modeling asks what could go wrong: who might attack, what they want, and which paths they could use. Code review and testing look for weaknesses such as broken access control, injection, insecure deserialization, exposed secrets, unsafe file handling, poor cryptography, or denial of service risks.

Triage is where security becomes operational. Not every finding deserves the same urgency. A confirmed vulnerability with a clear exploit path differs from a hardening recommendation that improves resilience. Teams rank issues by exploitability, impact, exposure, and fix complexity. Then they remediate through patches, configuration changes, dependency updates, architecture changes, or compensating controls such as rate limits and monitoring.

Real-world applications

In product engineering, software security shapes authentication, authorization, API design, input validation, logging, and release gates. In mobile environments, concepts such as Android sideloading raise questions about app provenance, permissions, and user trust. In systems engineering, hardware realities such as Arm big.LITTLE can influence isolation, performance throttling, and denial of service analysis.

AI systems add new security surfaces. Retrieval-augmented generation pipelines must protect source documents, prompts, retrieved context, and generated outputs. Vector databases and text embeddings introduce access control, data leakage, poisoning, and tenant isolation concerns. The same security fundamentals still apply: know the assets, model threats, validate controls, and monitor behavior.

Security reviews also support business decisions. A product manager can use findings to prioritize roadmap work. An engineer can use them to improve design patterns. A leader can use them to decide where automation helps and where expert review remains mandatory.

Where to go deeper

Start with secure coding and threat modeling, then connect those skills to the systems you build. If you work on mobile products, study Android sideloading and platform trust boundaries. If you work closer to infrastructure, explore Arm big.LITTLE and resource isolation. If you build AI applications, go deeper on retrieval-augmented generation, vector databases, and text embeddings so you can secure the data flows behind modern AI features.

The durable skill is not memorizing vulnerability names. It is learning how software fails, how attackers think, and how teams turn uncertain signals into reliable security decisions.